Jump to content

MooseGoneMad

Members
  • Content Count

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

MooseGoneMad last won the day on February 16

MooseGoneMad had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

19 Good

2 Followers

About MooseGoneMad

  • Rank
    Level 2

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. MooseGoneMad

    Games of the Decade (Official Discussion)

    A friend says Mass Effect 2. I think a Halo game might also qualify, but I've only played 3. It was pretty good.
  2. MooseGoneMad

    Games of the Decade (Official Discussion)

    I’m really having trouble finding a game I think should be in this list but isn’t. For the most part, all of these games have been huge achievements in world building, story telling, visual beauty, depth of content, replayability, and technological advancement. Other games... more of a market success than a masterpiece, but those deserve consideration too.
  3. MooseGoneMad

    DIY Tabletop Stuff

  4. MooseGoneMad

    Heavyshelf Snap!

    Back again with another guy. He's a young gecko hunter from Fallout: New Vegas getting ready to take a bite out of me.
  5. MooseGoneMad

    DIY Tabletop Stuff

    I've been sick today so I figured I might as well do something and ended up making this super minimal battlefield for a game project I'm working on. I was wondering what other people have done/made, so share your maps, props, and minis.
  6. Literally just realized this is posted in the Minecraft club. *Facepalm*
  7. Can this be the official minecraft thread for now? (I swear I do more than be sketchy!)
  8. Truly a sight to behold when what seems like a whacky, out-there, or otherwise limiting build turns out to be the standard. Of course, this is a different discussion entirely, but it's not like Skyrim has much going for it character-build-wise besides simple combos like this. Now a play through where you use illusion to *technically* not kill anyone? That's a sight to behold. That's also more challenge territory than it is a goofy build.
  9. It's no-holds-barred in this showdown of absurdity. I enjoy making characters more that I enjoy playing games across all sorts of mediums. In Fallout, Skyrim, DnD, Smite, or any other game that lets you shape a character's ability, I'm there to stretch it to absurdity. This got me thinking: what are some of the wackiest, most gimmicky, or most memorable character builds you've done in a game? Was it successful? Did it get stale quickly? Did you have an epiphany when making it? It doesn't matter if it's in abilities, spell combos, items bought, or anything else: I wanna hear about it! I'll start with Smite, because though I've given up on this game years ago, it once held one of the greatest character builds I've ever gotten to experience. Now, Smite is a MOBA, so these character builds revolved entirely around what items you buy. I was a Mercury main (among other gods) and I was less than pleased when I found out that the base movement speed for Mercury was not the highest in the game. So I did what anyone playing an ADC (Attack Damage Carry) would do: build 100% movement speed. Actives, Passives, Consumables: all was bought to make me the fastest person on the battlefield. Paired with Mercury's late game speed bonus, I eventually became a terror too fast to hit. You see, at a certain point, Mercury can move fast enough to outrun not only literally every other god in the game, but spells, dashes, and even teleports with a head start. Sitting happily at the max movement speed the game would allow, I could literally run circles around enemies while hitting them with my basic attack. I could run past a tower before it would hit me twice. Now, the damage output was miserable, sure, but when you're running too fast for them to land a hit does it really matter? The answer is no. Movement Speed Mercury will forever be the most surprising success I've had in a gimmick build. There has yet to be any contest. So what are some memorable builds of yours? How did you get your character to play the game in ways that are borderline-unintentional if not outright stupid?
  10. Link, because even if he fails he comes back again. On the other hand, as Setanta said he shouldn't need to come back at all... But seriously, the dude can go all Fierce Deity and stuff. Link.
  11. MooseGoneMad

    Neat Spells/Abilities in Games?

    Depending on how Magic works, a spell that swaps health and mana for a short duration could be cool. Or a spell that lets you detach your arm and have it crawl through spaces too small for you to fit.
  12. MooseGoneMad

    What was your first step in developing a game?

    /thread But actually, every single decision you make in a game's mechanics and how it plays is determined, in part, by the medium. Even some of the pre-established ideas which came first can find themselves changing fundamentally based on the medium. For instance, a PvP airship-battles game I have been working on is in the tabletop format. Even in this format, choices about how the players interact with the board matter. My original plan was for a mechanic of view range to allow for players to go "invisible" and engage in sneaky tricks such as bomb planting, trapping supply crates, and launching stealth attacks. Now, on a board game, this isn't impossible, but this idea either alters the medium, or the medium alters the idea. I could have done a battleship-esque style board divider, but the issue then becomes that you can't see the ships of the enemy at all. And, if the divider is removable, any secondary ships the player controls would be revealed. So that idea wouldn't work. My next idea was to have each player have a smaller card that represented the board. Here, players could move their ships before actually placing them on the board (which would signify the ships "popping" into view range). I quickly realized that this would mean players would be keeping track of movement on two different spaces if one ship was visible and one wasn't, and the additional hassle of remembering to move ships that aren't visible to the player in a game where keeping track of various attacks, effects, and injuries is already a lot for a player to handle, so I scrapped that idea entirely. My eventual compromise was to keep the concept of "view range" mechanically the same by implementing attack range. This solution was not the ideal, where players can go completely invisible from the enemy and use radars and scout ships tactically, but it was the adaptation of the idea that best fit the medium. Now, instead of having limited view range and unlimited attack range, players have unlimited view range and limited attack range. Radars and scout ships still have a use, but they instead increase attack range. This solution is the same mechanically (limiting the attack range of players) but not the same in gameplay, thus where the creative concept had to be partially sacrificed to fit the medium. The key difference between view range and attack range is stealth. Always seeing your opponents ships allows a player to plan for their movements. A view range feature would disrupt a players ability to plan for ship movements and change how the is game played. Numerous other features (such as fighters sent out by airships, sky-mines planted by airships, tracking bombs, smokescreens, etc.) have either not been implemented or have been changed to fit this change in the idea caused by the selection of the medium. So yes, I would say picking the medium comes first besides the idea stage, and even then the idea stage is subject to change based on the selection of the medium.
  13. I'm not a big MMO player, so this is difficult for me. But I will gladly speak from ignorance. I honestly think that there is no reason to play WoW classic unless you want to experience what WoW was like before or want to go on a nostalgia trip. What makes WoW classic charming (i.e. everything being clunky and ugly) is not a selling point to people who have a general interest in MMOs. If I was looking to get started in an MMO, I'd be looking for something that's free and refined; not an outdated reboot of a game that matters only to past players and "videogame historians". Someone please correct me if any of my assumptions are grossly incorrect, though.
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Check our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for details.